I'm calling out to the YouTube and world at large, asking for help with something that needs dealt with but that I can't do alone.
This song is "Riding to Vanity Fair" from Sir James Paul McCartney's "Chaos and Creation in the Backyard" album, 2005
1 comment:
Anonymous
said...
Droopy-
Good articles on Amanda etc.
Some advice. U mention u wrote to all the email addresses with some things, also copying and pasting the Amanda Baggs Controversy report. It's 40 pages. Likely, ur email will go to spam/trash. Or be immediately ignored due to it's length. Best to only do the link to the report http://amandabaggscontroversy.blogspot.com/
There was a reply to this quote. Then some comments below.
"""Droopy was in yet another Usenet group with Baggs in the 90s,where she asked Droopy to describe her autism in as much detail as possible,and that's where she got a lot of the material for her fake autism routine."""
1st- 'Droopy' would have to give her real and full name to have her accounts of everything taken seriously.
2nd- All the actual links for the Google Group or Usenet Group activity would have to be given.
3rd- Why would Amanda rely on group-posts to figure out what autism is? Droopy writing about her autism to Amanda means little. Amanda could instead have watched videos of autistic people. Amanda also worked with autistic children.
I'd add- Amanda could copy anyone - children, adults, etc. People shown on TV, movies, photos, books, articles, etc. There's no reason to copy you.
Even if she, hypothetically, is copying you, your saying she is will be laughed at by the media. Absolutely laughed at. Absolutely. Best best best to focus on the report http://amandabaggscontroversy.blogspot.com/
You haven't provided the Usenet Google Group posts of you discussions with Amanda. This MIGHT be some basis for media, but all you've had is heresay. This worth 0 really.
1 comment:
Droopy-
Good articles on Amanda etc.
Some advice. U mention u wrote to all the email addresses with some things, also copying and pasting the Amanda Baggs Controversy report. It's 40 pages. Likely, ur email will go to spam/trash. Or be immediately ignored due to it's length. Best to only do the link to the report http://amandabaggscontroversy.blogspot.com/
There was a reply to this quote. Then some comments below.
"""Droopy was in yet another Usenet group with Baggs in the 90s,where she asked Droopy to describe her autism in as much detail as possible,and that's where she got a lot of the material for her fake autism routine."""
1st- 'Droopy' would have to give her real and full name to have her accounts of everything taken seriously.
2nd- All the actual links for the Google Group or Usenet Group activity would have to be given.
3rd- Why would Amanda rely on group-posts to figure out what autism is? Droopy writing about her autism to Amanda means little. Amanda could instead have watched videos of autistic people. Amanda also worked with autistic children.
I'd add- Amanda could copy anyone - children, adults, etc. People shown on TV, movies, photos, books, articles, etc. There's no reason to copy you.
Even if she, hypothetically, is copying you, your saying she is will be laughed at by the media. Absolutely laughed at. Absolutely. Best best best to focus on the report http://amandabaggscontroversy.blogspot.com/
You haven't provided the Usenet Google Group posts of you discussions with Amanda. This MIGHT be some basis for media, but all you've had is heresay. This worth 0 really.
Post a Comment